Penerapan Strategi Think–Pair–Share untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Kelas X SMA Darussalam
Keywords:
Think-Pair-Share, Reading Comprehension, Classroom Action ResearchAbstract
This study aims to improve the reading comprehension skills of tenth-grade students through the implementation of the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) cooperative learning strategy. This Classroom Action Research (CAR) was conducted in two cycles at Darussalam Senior High School, with 32 tenth-grade Bahasa students as subjects. Data were collected through reading comprehension tests (pre-test and post-test) and observations of student learning activities. The results showed a significant increase in the average reading comprehension score of students, from 65.2 to 74.8 in Cycle I at the beginning (pre-cycle), and again to 85.5 in Cycle II. Furthermore, the percentage of classical learning completion also increased from 35 to 65, reaching 90 at the end of Cycle II, exceeding the established success indicator. This improvement was supported by increased student activeness and motivation during the learning process. Therefore, it can be concluded that the implementation of the Think-Pair-Share strategy is effective and can improve the reading comprehension skills of tenth-grade students.
References
Anderson, J. R. (2019). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (9th ed.). Worth Publishers.
Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(5), 593–604.
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77–165). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Budi Gunawan. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Sinar Grafika.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum.
Depdiknas. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126–135.
Hopkins, D. (2008). A Teacher's Guide to Classroom Research (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Jannidis, F. (2010). Character. In P. Hühn, J. C. Meister, J. Pier, & W. Schmid (Eds.), Handbook of Narratology (pp. 6–19). Walter de Gruyter.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative Learning. Kagan Cooperative Learning.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner (3rd ed.). Deakin University Press.
Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion. In A. S. Anderson (Ed.), Mainstreaming digest (pp. 109–113). University of Maryland College of Education.
Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–382.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slamet, S. (2020). Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia di Sekolah. Bumi Aksara.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Tarigan, H. G. (2018). Membaca sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Angkasa.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Widyastuti, A. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman Teks Deskriptif. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 10(2), 123-134.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Herman Gusmanto, Nayla Khoirunisa, Sundari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
